Federal Agency Pushes for Coast-to-Coast Ban on Use of Electronic Devices While Driving
March 2, 2012
Mounting evidence connecting serious automobile accidents to the use of cell phones and similar gadgets has prompted a federal safety agency to campaign for a nationwide ban on using portable electronic devices while driving.
If the National Transportation Safety Board gets its way, motorists across the country will be barred from using any kind of portable electronic device (PED) while driving, except in emergencies. The NTSB, an independent federal agency that investigates transportation accidents, first proposed the nationwide ban in December in the wake of a fatal vehicle collision that occurred on a Missouri interstate highway in 2010.
In its recommendations, contained at the end of the report on its investigation into the causes of the Missouri traffic accident, the NTSB said that all 50 states and the District of Columbia should “ban the non-emergency use of portable electronic devices (other than those designed to support the driving task) for all drivers.”
The NTSB did not explain exactly what it meant by devices “designed to support the driving task,” but in public debate about the recommendation it has commonly been assumed that the phrase refers to GPS units and the like. Thus, auto manufacturers would still be allowed to offer vehicles with built-in GPS systems. The recommendation would also obviously exempt new safety technologies such as backup cameras, lane-departure warnings and forward collision warning systems.
The proposed ban, however, would apply to hands-free use of portable devices for talking, texting, playing media or retrieving data. Safety experts have long warned that engaging with electronic devices creates an unsafe distraction from driving, even when they don’t require a driver to take a hand off the wheel or eyes off the road.
The NTSB says it has investigated multiple accidents since 2002 in which distractions from electronic devices such as cell phones and laptops played a part. These accidents included all modes of transportation which the NTSB monitors – not only truck, bus and car crashes but also incidents involving boats, planes and trains. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says that more than 3,000 people died in distraction-related motor vehicle accidents in 2010.
The NTSB, NHTSA and other safety groups worry that as mobile devices proliferate and become more and more a part of everyday life, the number of fatalities and vehicle personal injury cases resulting from distracted driving will skyrocket. NHTSA is developing voluntary safety guidelines for manufacturers of built-in car electronics that will encourage them to design devices that can be used while diverting minimal attention away from driving.
Last month, an NTSB official testified before a New York State Senate committee on the need for standardized laws against using PEDs while driving. Across the United States today, there are great variations among state and local laws relating to the use of cell phones and other devices while operating a motor vehicle. Organizations such as the American Automobile Association have issued statements supporting the NTSB recommendation.
The NTSB’s recommendation regarding use of electronic devices is part of its general campaign against distracted driving. The NTSB will hold an “attentive driving forum” on March 27 at its headquarters in Washington, D.C.
The Mesa auto accident attorneys at Skousen, Gulbrandsen & Patience can help with your Phoenix auto accident and personal injury case. Contact us for a free consultation.
Disclaimer: The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use and access to this website or any of the links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.








